The Existenial Being of Mathmatics

THE EXISTENTIAL BEING OF MATHEMATICS

Zeroness & 9-ness vs. "1"-ness; Zero-Nine based vs. 10 based Numerical System:


Nothing is ever rejected, not rejection and not even Nothing. The Beingness rejects none and not even none nor rejection are rejected. There is 'no' rejection, not even of rejection or of 'no'.

We is not Everything Being as one ('oneness'), We is simply Everything, Being.

"Oneness" does not take the shape of Everything, rather it mimmicks Everything by dividing others through its indivuduality (In-divided-duality). 2 Divided by 1 is 2. Oneness 'wants' to be individual. To Be Zeroness (Everything), and Nine (Nothingness), is to BE. It IS Existence that defines Nothing and in turn Nothing defines the non-Existent boundaries of Existence which shows Us that Existence (Beingness) is Outfinitely limitless, boundless, and shapeless. 'One' must Be Outfinitely dividing into (in two) EVERYTHING, (individuality = In-divided-duality) thus dividing Everything to take the shape of Everything, and defeating the purpose of simply Being Everything. One is "trying" to BE Everything, so it is mimmicking. Yet it is perfect, just as the Being IS. We divided the Being so that We may see Nothing and Everything as Existence Being Us, WE ARe Existence.

"Oneness" is not the Beingness; because "one" is dividing Existence into (in two) "Nothingness" (illusion of separateness), allowing Us to see Everything as Everything AND Nothing as Everything. We is Zeroness, both Everything AND Nothing (numbers 0 & 9), there is 'Nothing' to be divided into, thus WE ARe Everything, Being.

Nothing (No-THING) cannot define itself without Existence, because it is Existence that allows 'Nothing' to Be 'non-Existent'. Everything Divided by Zero is allways undefinable. 1-:-0=Undefined, because Zero is ALL inclusive: THINGs (numerals 1-8), No-THING AND Every-THING [9and0]: i.e. "non-Existence", Existence, "individuality", Outdividuality, "illusion", reality etc.

"Oneness" is NOT the Everythingness AND Nothingness defining Zeroness, nor is "one" the Zeroness defining the Everythingness AND Nothingness. 0-:-1=0. Numbers Nine and Zero allways stay true to themselves; Our Omniverse (OMNI-verse; ALL-words) is a base 0 AND 9 mathematical BEING, NOT a base 10 numerical SYSTEM. The Being consists of numerals [9 and 0 ] (which share the same properties and attributes) and 1 through 8.

The product of nine times any number is allways 9. i.e. 9x3=9. There is no 10 because 10 = 1+0, 1+0 = 1 (Digital Root property). The number line consists of [9 and 0] and returns to 1, thus [9 and 0] times any number is [9 and 0] and [9 and 0] +,- any number equates to that number itself. There is never a negative sum or difference. There is no positive or negative, they are simply movements along the ennead number line (shown at the end of this post).

In a base 10, 9x3=36, 3+6=9.
0x3=0.

Example [9and0]+5=5

In a base 10, 9+5=14, 1+4=5.

The imprisoning factor occurs between oneness and Zeroness, ergo We created the illusion of 10. In this aspect We allso created the illusion of creation and the creation of illusion. Existence has Allways Existed and Allways will Exist; Existence, not created, Allways Exists.

[9and0] are non-Existence and Existence represented in numbers:

The Existing, non-Existent boundary of Existence IS Nothing and is defined by Existence as having no boundaries. Non-Existence defines Existence as not having Existing boundaries. Existence defines non-Existence as the boundary of Existence. Non-Existence defines the boundaries of Existence as Being non-Existent. Existence defines itself as having non-Existent boundaries. The non-Existent boundaries are Nothing. Nothing is bounded by Existence and Existence is bounded by Nothing. The boundary of Existence is non-Existent through non-Existence.

0 minus 0, 0 minus 9, 9 minus 0, 9 minus 9 = These base 10 operations are illusory in that they cannot be performed because 9 and

Mod Edit: All Caps Title– Please Review This Link.

[edit on 22/11/2006 by Umbrax]

0 are ultimately connected

Nothing is Everything, Everything is Nothing [9and0]; Nothing minus Nothing IS Everything. [9and0] minus [9and0] IS [9and0]. To take away Nothing's Nothingness is to make it SOMEthing, since Nothing is the boundary of Existence and Something IS "No-thing" Existing (Existence has no boundaries), Something now becomes Everything (Outfinity and Eternity).

In another light; 0-0 = 0. Because Nothing IS Nothing, to take away Nothing from Nothing would equate to Nothing because there is Nothing to take away. Nothing Exists, yet it doesn't Exist, and it couldn't Exist without Existence, allthough it doesn't actually Exist. Nothing is a triality. Everything is a triality. Existence is a triality. Blackness, whiteness, and grayness; 0, 9, and [0and9].

Mathematically Being:

There is no want and there is no need in Beingness, Being is to Be.

You and I chose to Be US, and We-ness Is the Beingness. We are the choice. We chose Us. The choice is made, there is no need for choice in Beingness, Being IS the choice.

0 is a circle and a circle in base 10 mathematics is 360 degrees. 3+6+0=9. A circle has 9 degrees.

0 x any number is itself. 9 x any number is itself.

Zero (0) = Everything and Nothing.
Nine (9) = Nothing and Everything.
[9 and 0]=Thing, Nothing, and Everything (Existence, non-Existence, Being, etc.)

NUMBER LINE---> [9and0] 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 <--- ThIs Is All that Is/Is not Mathematics

[edit on 22-11-2006 by LastOutfiniteVoiceEternal]

welcome.. namaste, as SteveR says.. lol

the wonderful world of reality..
aren't coincidences amazing... (3+6+0=9) .. lol

Agreed Coincidences are amazing, yet then again, that's just an amazing coincidence. Coincidentally, coincidences are amazing. Coinciding with coincidence, amazing amazes Us. Amazed, coincidence watches as amazing coincides with itself. AMAZING, or a maze of coincidences? We are lost and found in this maze of coincidental love. It is coincidentally uncoincidental, and uncoincidentally coincidental. Or is this all just a coincidence?

Our day is wonderful

[edit on 22-11-2006 by LastOutfiniteVoiceEternal]

Glad to see you here... in the NOW of our wonderful day.

It sure is funny though how when we realize certain things we get a kid like playfulness, I absolutely love it. words (a variation on numbers) are great... just gotta move the Serpent to the end of the WORD .. instead of the beginning.. lol SWORD / WORDS...
the end of the WAR or WOR is in the Death of the Serpent .. or in the END of the Serpent.. lol

it would seem that WORDS and SWORD are mathematical equations themselves

[edit on 11/22/2006 by PuRe EnErGy]

What is this riddle galore or something..?
And why is it a wonderful day?

[edit on 22-11-2006 by 7Ayreon]

If I told you that, it wouldn't be wonderful anymore.. it would become whatever definition or description I gave you..

it is a wonderful day because perhaps this little riddle will inspire you to ask yourself how many coincidences does it take before the grouping of coincidences are more than just amazing? How many coincidences need to belong to a group to make the coincidences part of reality, and true?

how about WAR or WOR?... WAR=DEATH and DEATH=Satan/Serpent .. Why not kill WAR or WOR by ending WOR with the Death of the Serpent... or rather the equation like this...Kill(WOR+D+S) Kill WAR with the death of Satan.
WORDS... but we confused the equation and wrote it like this... Kill(S+WOR+D)
SWORD.
We put Satan before death
so the equation is wrong, and produces bad results.

Correction:

[9and0] is Nothing and Everything, Alpha and Omega.

NUMBER LINE---> [9and0] 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 [9and0] <--- ThIs Is All that Is/Is not Mathematics.

The [9and0] on the right is used for subtraction (movements to the left).Subtraction is carried out through the [9and0] on the right side of the number line with movement to the left to find difference.

The [9and0] on the left is used for addition (movements to the right).Addition is carried out through the [9and0] on the left side of the number line with movement to the right to find the sum

Correction:

"[9 and 0] +,- any number equates to that number itself." <--- error.

Is, [9and0] + any number equates to that number itself <---- correction

[edit on 23-11-2006 by LastOutfiniteVoiceEternal]

(Note to Moderators : Aware of double post, u2u has been sent to Sanctum)

There Exists 3 realities. The reality of illusion, the reality of reality, and the reality of both together as the 3rd (ultimate consciousness).

The realities of illusion are concepts that We have produced so that We may come to know the reality of reality and then ultimately both together (the unified field)

The number 1 Exists as a reality within illusion and as an illusion within reality. To perceive Existence in its true geometrical form (a subset of the all-inclusive Outfinite formlessness), 1 is never found.

One dot is not actually one dot; one dot is measured by a line (diameter), with each end of the diameter consisting of two more points or dots, and of which those dots can also contain a diameter, with each end consisting of two more points or dots. Even the lines made to connect the dots can be measured. No-where and now-here does 1 exist, in Both illusion and reality, mending Both and allowing us to see the Perfect Existence; the acceptance of Everything, because WE ARe Everything through accepting Us, even that of illusion, because We IS Everything.

We accepts rejection so that there Is 'No' rejection, not even of rejection (illusion) or of 'No'.

The "first" dimension that is spoken of is really "two", which is really "three", and so on. Dimensions are illusional, yet accepted because it is the thought that WE ARe Us, and so WE ARe.

"Reality is merely an illusion, albeit a very persistent ONE." Albert Einstein

Sidenote : The Omniverse wanted to make sound effects so it could hear itself, then it realized it needed something to hear with as well, so it decided to Evolve clever little bi-pedal, dualistically symetrical creatures in its image. WE ARe the Omniverse.

Harmony and Blessings

When subscribed to the Digital Root Property (a manufacturer of the Existentialized Beingness of Mathematics) any grouping of numbers that add up to 9 are divisible(s) and multiple(s) of 9. This quality is also in appliance with 0.

Example : 9963 , 9+9+6+3= 27, 2+7=9.

9963-:-9=1107

Three expert 'opinions' about math:







I tend to share these opinions!

Here are a couple of others to think about:

The only thing that is constant is that Everything is all ways changing. Thus there is and is No consistency.

The only constistent Existence of God and the Devil are that they Exist as words, perhaps We are these two characters acting through Us.

Santa Clause is consistent, he arrives every Christmas for most, yet does he Exist?

Thoughts are consistent and persistent, can We prove they Exist? Yes and No.

How many times does something have to happen to prove that it is consistent? Consistency is relative. Nothing never happened, yet its Existence is proved in this sentence.

If a thing ceases to Be consistent by the expectations of the Human mind does that mean it ceases to Exist?

Everything does and does not Exist, the consistency of it is irrelevent

[edit on 17-12-2006 by LastOutfiniteVoiceEternal]

'Constant' and 'consistency' are two different concepts and not interchangeable in that fashion:

From The Free Dictionary:


The idea that change is the only constant is actually a statement which supports the idea of consistency....



To such a statement I can only reply by reference back to the first quote I posted:

You can not apply mathematics as long as words still becloud reality.


He certainly must; the presents appear and the cookies and milk disappear...evidence supports existence of such an entity (whether or not it is a fat jolly man in a red velvet, white fur trimmed suit who travels via magic sleigh and 8 tiny reindeer is subjective - however the evidence supports an objective truth which supports the basic principle.)


Consistency is only relative to itself; see above.


That would be 'reliable' or even 'believable' but not 'consistent.' Once you add the human factor of opinion and relative comparison, the consistency is no longer the issue.


But you see - that is the consistency of existence - it both does and does not 'exist' and therefore it IS consistent and unchanging in its nature....contradiction and juxtaposition are also concepts which are independent of 'consistency.'

The idea of consistency that is meant in the quote I posted is such:
1 + 1 = 2
or, as the Beatles put it:
'one and one and one is three.'

So far that has not been disproven to my knowledge.

We agree in synch. There is no argument here and there never should be =) Have a wonderfull evening annie. There is and is Not, there is there and there is Not there, and Not is and is Not Existence and Non-Existence.

The testimony that is and is not consistent with the facts is Existence and Non-Existence.

Definitions: Too many per word.

Harmony and Blessings of and in Perfection♥

P.s. That has Been proven and disproven

[edit on 17-12-2006 by LastOutfiniteVoiceEternal]

When one divides one's self one must become more than one. Division speaks of a splitting that takes place, not a matching of numerical values.

One does not Exist because it can all ways be divided, measured, split, spliced, sliced, diced... mmm, starting to sound like a nice meal; now We require salt and pepper. Is the preference table or desk?

The number 1 by its self is all ways larger than its self. "Why is this?", One might ask one's self... well, because One can ask one's self. One could not converse with one's self if one were truly only the concept of One. If there were truly one Existing, then there would only Exist one thing as one word as one letter, one concept, one letter as one number etc. One Exists and does Not Exist to allow this sentence to explain its self.

If there Be a Being on this planet that can present a one that cannot Be divided then let it come forth. Everything can Be divided; Our species and Our current consciousness are an example of this.

The concept of these numbers that We have created Exist in the reality of illusion; Existing is a shapeless reality, a reality with no limits, no barriers, complete freedom and an abundance of love and ecstacy through the unlimited strength of the mind force

1-:-1<1 (with the first two one's that are dividing Existing as the illusory 1 and the answer Existing as the one that is really Not one, yet Outfinitely divided to Be Everything because 1 divided itself)
1-:-1>1(with the first 1 [numerator] Existing as a 1 that can Be Outfinitely divided, and the second 1[denominator] Existing as the illusory one [the one that most of Us refer to as "one"], and the answer equating to the illusory one as well.

and, the well known,
1-:-1=1 (where the value of the three ones are synonomous relative to the reality that We are choosing the perceive)

[edit on 18-12-2006 by LastOutfiniteVoiceEternal]

There is all ways dividing through the true meaning of division.

Example : 2 divided by 2 = 4. Take two apples and divide them by two knives, there are 4 pieces instead of the two that We started with, yet it is really still the components of the two apples that are making up these four pieces.

But, shall We continuously stagnize Our thinking that 2 divided by 2 is just measly ol' illusionary one. This thinking makes an underwhelming amount of cents. Do not think, go to school and watch television, become mindless robots while We bask in the perversion of Our blood driven power and climatical censorship of Our freedom, a resolution to the undying fear of death. Funny how those emotions feed themselves, huh... an undying fear of Death and defeat only defeats the fear of not fearing death and defeat, and is created by fearing death and defeat. There is no death and there is no defeat because We love Us, because We lives to love... allow fear... allow fear to cancel out fear, fear is and fear is not. Natural, just as is every emotion, feeling, intuition; defeat and death are thoughts of the Being, thoughts that are chosen. We live happily when We choose to change our reality to otherwise (other wisdom)

[edit on 20-12-2006 by LastOutfiniteVoiceEternal]

Another insight to make lucid the fallacy of understanding our current base "10" system is as follows:

We use "10" symbols, more so the symbol(s) "10" as the concept of 10, but the symbol of 10 its self is merely one and zero smashed together. Some say the one acts as a place holder, a place holder for what? The Zero? Zero represents Nothing, you can't have a place holder for that which does not Exist.

So, while we may have a numerical system based around the concept of "10" symbols, we are yet to intellectually show this. Rather we are using the symbols 0 through 9 where 9 is actually the !~"10"th~! symbol if we are to start at and include zero, zero that is a number and a concept that we implement in to our daily lives as something, when in actuality it is nothing.

As is shown above: we see that 0 and 9 have the exact same qualities and properties through the digital root addition and multiplication processes. They are mirrors and fittingly so, they are opposite ends of our numerical spectrum.

Now we may start questioning the symbols them selves and the new comprehension of the numerical system.

One "third" would really be 2 if we are starting at 0 and progressing towards 9. 0, 1, 2. One from three (1/3) happens to be 2.

"2/3" would actually be 5, and a full or whole 3/3 would be 8. 8 happens to be 2 "zeros". It also happens to be that 2+3 (2/3) = 5. 2 goes in to 3 1.5 times. 1+5 (1.5) is 6 and 2/3 of 9 starting from 1 is 6.

Where as if we start at one and progress towards 9, one third would be 3. 3 is an eight spliced almost in half and 3 is nearly, but not quite half of eight. The symbols seem to represent themselves quite well. 3 divided by 1 (1/3) is 3.

2/3's would be 6. 6 is an upside down nine. 2 times 3 (2/3) is 6. 2 divided by 3 is .666666, etc. 6 times 3 is 18, and 1+8 is 9. 6 times 3 is 18 and 18 divided by 2 is 9, 9 upside down is 6. 2.... 3.... 6.... 9....

3/3 would be 9. 3 times 3 (3/3) is 9. 3 divided by 3 is 1, and 9+1 would be 10, 1+0 (10) would be one, and that just happens to be where we would be going next if we were to add 1 to 9.

0, 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 8, 9

Any unconsistencies, any questions? Help would be appreciated.

11 symbols, base 10.

1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 1-0 <--- 11 symbols... base 10?

[edit on 16-5-2007 by LastOutfiniteVoiceEternal]