reply to post by Ciphor
It's good that you're passionate about this
I checked out your links when you first posted (I read everyone's post)
I think Beever's work is awesome - always have
Nevertheless, I have to acknowledge when other's do similarly-fine work.
I think your definition of a copycat is skewed somewhat. Yes the works are similar in theme and style - but not really in content.
I guess I'm just not as passionate as you about defending Beever's work.
After all, the interpretation of art is for everyone, not just the exclusive few.
|