AboveTopSecret.com Video and Media Portal.Books, posters, and more.T-shirts, mouse pads, cups, and bags.Member podcasts.Conspiracy theory wiki.Alternative news headlinesBelowTopSecret.com - off topic and general chit chat.AboveTopSecret.com - conspiracy theories and


 

 

This topic is in the Computer Help discussion forum.  (rss)


M$ releases windows 7 RC to the public


<<  1    2  >>



reply posted on 30-5-2009 @ 07:23 PM by ArMaP


reply to post by contemplator



The difference between Windows 2000 and XP was more or less the same, just some additions to the OS and new hardware-related additions, in the same way Windows 98 was based on Windows 95, there is nothing new in this type of release from Microsoft.

And I don't have any problem with Vista, I use it since the Beta 2 came out in the summer of 2007, if my memory is not failing.

Also, I don't know of any case of problems with Vista, to me it's the best version of Windows yet (but I think Windows 7 is better).



   copyright & usage 


reply posted on 30-5-2009 @ 08:04 PM by mrmonsoon


With the new proc, I find win7 to be as fast if not faster than xp with my old proc.

I choose this processor so as to maintain the rest of my hardware.

If someone is building a rig new for win 7, go with one of the Icore processors.

They have hyperthreading and win7 is massively multithreaded.



   copyright & usage 


reply posted on 1-6-2009 @ 10:47 AM by Now_Then


I'm gonna try installing win 7 on a 333Mhz celeron machine with 128 ram

No real reason other than I have the technology (came free from a skip)

I will post results in a day or two when I get round to doing it.



   copyright & usage 


reply posted on 1-6-2009 @ 10:48 AM by apex


Can we place bets? I say it'll blue screen in the install, with not enough memory.

Nice idea though.



   copyright & usage 
AboveTopSecret.com is advertising supported.


reply posted on 9-6-2009 @ 01:04 PM by mrmonsoon


My god this is sick, but I now prefer win 7 over XP.



   copyright & usage 


reply posted on 9-6-2009 @ 01:16 PM by TrueAmerican


Originally posted by mrmonsoon
My god this is sick, but I now prefer win 7 over XP.


Heresy I tell ya. Pure heresy!

When are you going to ever learn that it takes 5 years of updates and service packs before MS ever gets a stable op sys?



   copyright & usage 


reply posted on 9-6-2009 @ 05:53 PM by mrmonsoon


Ya know the real sick thing is I have found win7 to be cooperative and stable than XP.


I am sure the XP gods will smite me, but it's true!!!!

You do know when I load win 7 on my laptop, i was hooked up to my wireless in 20 min, seriously!
When Vista was reloaded (hardware failure, fixed and reload by factory) after over 2 hours, I could not get my computer on my wireless network.

That said, I must admit, win 7 IS a heaver load than XP.

It makes up for it in it's massively multithreading/stability and it's willingness to work with a WIDE group of hardware.

Now, for those with a much more "basic" system, celeron proc ands 512 ram
DON"T DO IT!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Ignore M$'s minimun requirements.

You need dualcore and 2 gigs ram minimum to run well.

Another interesting note-TA- is that M$ is right now working on SP1 for win 7, seriously!

[edit on 6/9/2009 by mrmonsoon]



   copyright & usage 


<<  1    2  >>


















































ATS Server: www3.theabovenetwork.com
Powered by AboveTop:Board v2.3
Header data processed in 0.002 seconds
Page processed in 0.090 seconds
6 total database queries (1)

(:)








The Below Top Secret General Discussion Web site is a wholly owned social content community of The Above Network, LLC.

This content community relies on user-generated content from our member contributors.
The opinions of our members are not those of site ownershipwho maintains
strict editorial agnosticism and simply provides a collaborative venue for free expression.






It looks like you're using some kind of software designed to block advertising while surfing our site.

We work very hard to provide an efficient Internet presence that services over 200,000 daily visits from people and automated web spiders. A large web site like this, that can handle that amount of traffic, is increasingly expensive to operate. Our only viable source of revenue (for now) are the ads displayed on each page.

If you enjoy our content, please enable our domain in your ad-blocking package.

more information       contact us

[hide this message]