 |
reply posted on 22-1-2003 @ 08:56 PM by Quicksilver
|
Earlier someone said the christains destroyed the Alaxandrian Church. Wasnt it the Muslims that did that??? BUt back to the point id like to change my
vote from attila to Sun Tzu without him how amny of these great leaders would have still have been great? Nepolian was also a great leader.
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 22-1-2003 @ 09:02 PM by FreeMason
|
Alexandrian church? You mean the Alexandrian library? Or the church when the Muslims took over?
Heh...you know why muslims build the tall towers? It has a lot more to do with than just to have the priest/shiek whomever he is, be heard by all.
They built the Tall towers in christian areas to show that MUSLIMS WERE HERE heh....anyways.
I still say the Greek Hoplite was the best "warrior" remember, we're talking warriors, not oaf generals who sit behind the lines reading maps
Sincerely,
no signature
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 22-1-2003 @ 09:18 PM by mad scientist
|
I disagree with the Greeks, Fm. If the way you described their fighting is true, then they don't seem too bright, charging at each other. Whilst you
might think this is brave, it could hardly be considered genious military thinking.
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 22-1-2003 @ 09:20 PM by Quicksilver
|
OOOOPSS Alaxandrian Library i distinctively remember reading that out of at least 2 differnt history books that the muslims burned it to the ground
because it defied the teachings of Alah. I dont get what ur implying FM about the towers???
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 22-1-2003 @ 09:22 PM by Machiavelli/Sun Tzu
|
China had an Ok army. Im talking about Persians and The Russian cavalry was very powerful (and had far superior numbers ). Khan was not seen as a
great conquer since he was a eastern barbarian in western eyes. His great battles were not put to writing like Alexanders were. So in the western
world he is thought of a loser.
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 23-1-2003 @ 05:49 AM by Illmatic67
|
freemason
you still havent told me where I'm wrong about Napolean..
and me saying he's dumb is not a fact, it's a opinion..
just like right now, i'mma call you a herb, that's my opinion not a fact.. though it seems it may be a fact now.
[Edited on 1-23-2003 by Illmatic67]
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 23-1-2003 @ 12:45 PM by xaos
|
My Votes:
Genghis Khan: I lived in Mongolia for the most impressionable years of my life, and consider Temujin an incredible leader.
Robert E. Lee: You cannot deny it, he was one of the greatest tacticians of his time, and a gentleman. (also on the civil war: Sherman was one of the
first believers in total war, a style of war that included everyone including non-combatants. Longstreet: the progenitor of modern trench and
defensive warfare.)
William Wallace: I am descended from Robert the Bruce so I think he is a great man.
There are others.
I am a horrible decision maker because I look at all sides of an issue so I have many favorites.
XAOS
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 17-3-2003 @ 09:20 PM by BuddhaCession
|
Miyamoto Musashi
Miyamoto Musashi is easily the best warrior of the last thousand years if not of all time. He fought in over sixty duels which he never lost one(one
was actually a tie) He was a master of the Art of War and wrote a comparable book in his last days called "The Book of Five Rings" which was more
about personal strategy but could be applied to a large scale war.
ONE
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 17-3-2003 @ 09:21 PM by BuddhaCession
|
Miyamoto Musashi
Miyamoto Musashi is easily the best warrior of the last thousand years if not of all time. He fought in over sixty duels which he never lost one(one
was actually a tie) He was a master of the Art of War and wrote a comparable book in his last days called "The Book of Five Rings" which was more
about personal strategy but could be applied to a large scale war.
ONE
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 18-3-2003 @ 05:17 AM by ultra_phoenix
|
The Greatest Warrior in the past 1,000 years
I like Patton.
With a General like Patton, even if you have to go fight in Hell, you'll win.
But my vote is going to Mac Arthur !
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 18-3-2003 @ 05:30 AM by Nans DESMICHELS
|
JOAN OF ARC
MAHOMET
CHE GUEVARA
SARAH CONOR
THE GENERAL GRANT
THE GENERAL DESMICHELS
and
SAMO HUNG (but only in shangai)
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 18-3-2003 @ 08:17 AM by roadghost
|
Who ever it was it was some geezer with sword, sheild or spear facing straight on to another opponent.
Just watched a program where they trained a bunch of US soildiers, policemen and firefighters to dress, live and fight like Roman legionaries. Even
these well trained men at the peak level of fitness found it exhausting and the battle training indicative of how terrifying it must have been for
real.
The general consensus was that they were real hard men in those days.
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 18-3-2003 @ 08:30 AM by Tetsuo-51
|
I think George W Bush is the best. I mean, look at him! He's a genius! I know you will all agree with me...
...*AHEM* j/k
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 18-3-2003 @ 03:01 PM by Tropes21
|
quote from illmatic "he was fighting the most evil people of all, the white americans"
god i hope you die a slow miserable death. hopefully a white wasp is the one who kills you to for that matter.
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 18-3-2003 @ 03:49 PM by ultra_phoenix
|
Originally posted by Tropes21
quote from illmatic "he was fighting the most evil people of all, the white americans"
god i hope you die a slow miserable death. hopefully a white wasp is the one who kills you to for that matter. 
Don't go mad Tropes21. ISllamatic67 is just a little racist without any importance who like racist like him, i.e, MalX.
[Edited on 19-3-2003 by ultra_phoenix]
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 19-3-2003 @ 01:13 AM by BuddhaCession
|
Musashi
Name one person that could defeat Miyamoto Musashi.
P.ositive E.nergy A.lways C.reates E.levation
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 19-3-2003 @ 08:06 PM by necro99
|
Originally posted by FreeMason
Actually I'll post this a second post, first off, Hannibal is the ONLY man in HISTORY to ever and I say EVER!!!! Completely surround an enemy army,
COMPLETELY.
As he did with 80000 romans whom wouldn't give up and he completely slaughtered them.
It wouldn't be for another 2300 years before anyone would get that close to surrounding an entire army completely, do you know who that was? Bet you
don't....Shwarztkopf, came very close to surrounding an entire Iraqi army but failed to close the gap.
As for Napoleon, most of the stuff you said about him was wrong Illimatic, just like about hannibal.
And your thinking that Alexander the Great, whom was great, he conquered lands all the way to India, he pushed farther than any greek knew how large
the world was, and because of it most of his greek army left, and he was forced to raise a foriegn army to complete his conquest.
Also, the Library of Alexandria was destroyed by Christians some 500 years after the death of Alexander the Great. When it was destroyed it still had
tons of information, that was when the dark ages began.
Sincerely,
no signature 
What about the american army at Bastogne during the ardennes offencive?
Oh, yeah. Hannibal Is the greatest.
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 19-3-2003 @ 08:44 PM by Illmatic67
|
ultra
I'mma call you mini-me from now on because your ALWAYS on my nuts.
tropes, I know what I said was wrong but if you knew anything about that time period you'd know why I said it, I apologize if it offended you.
Hannibal IS the greatest.
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 20-3-2003 @ 05:24 AM by BuddhaCession
|
Hannibal may have been the best general(along with Sun Tzu) but neither of them could have defeated Musashi in a one on on duel! Never.
Illmatic... Can you give me proof that Hannibal was an original man. According to Malachi Z. York; the Canaanites were actually white(the direct
ancestors of the Phoenicians; due to a curse of leprosy.)
Check the curse of Ham (Canaan) in Genesis.
According to many "Gods and Earth's"(and the Mormon's), the Canaanites were black.
Let's build.
ONE
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 20-3-2003 @ 05:32 AM by U.S. Patriot
|
EISENHOWER!!!!!!!
When he and the British handed France back over to them on a silver platter........how is that for justice!
American and Britsh blood shed for humanity.
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |