 |
|
Topic started on 26-9-2008 @ 10:11 AM by DimensionalDetective
|
Man Sues Doctors After Penis Amputated
www.wlky.com
 According to the lawsuit, Philip Seaton, 61, went to have a circumcision last Octoberas part of treatment for a medical condition. Seaton said
when he woke up from the procedure, he realized his penis had been amputated. (visit the link for the full news article)
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 26-9-2008 @ 10:11 AM by DimensionalDetective
|
And in todays, "What the?" news...
Talk about a medical malpractice nightmare come to life.
My guess is that no amount of lawsuit money is ever going to make up for how traumitized this poor gentleman is going to be...
Can something like this EVER be reversed?
The lawsuit states that Patterson received consent to perform a circumcision and only a circumcision, and that Seaton did not consent to his
penis being removed.
Kevin George, the plaintiff's attorney, said Patterson amputated the organ after finding cancer, but he only had consent to remove the foreskin.
"Sometimes you have an emergency and you have to do this, but he could very easily closed him up and said, 'Here are your options. You have cancer,'
and the family would have said, 'We want a second opinion. This is a big deal,'" George said.
(visit the link for the full news article)
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
|
reply posted on 26-9-2008 @ 10:14 AM by ThichHeaded
|
Hes 61 get over it.. Its not like he can use it now anymore anyway..
Then again.. there is Viagra... So who knows... Still funny none the less..
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
|
reply posted on 26-9-2008 @ 10:17 AM by ModernAcademia
|
if that happened to me I would just drink and smoke my life away
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
|
reply posted on 26-9-2008 @ 10:20 AM by d11_m_na_c05
|
reply to post by ThichHeaded
Wow i hope someone cuts your johnson off. From the way you talk you definitely dont need to breed!
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
|
reply posted on 26-9-2008 @ 10:23 AM by Dock6
|
Doubtless there will be a lot more information forthcoming. The surgeon will have to prove it was an emergency of such magnitude that immediate
amputation was vital in order the patient's life be saved.
Were there alternatives to immediate amputation ?
Could amputation have been postponed for 24 hours without endangering the patient's life ?
Guess we'll just have to wait to hear the surgeon's side of the story
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
|
reply posted on 26-9-2008 @ 10:24 AM by Rook1545
|
 Originally posted by ThichHeaded
Hes 61 get over it.. Its not like he can use it now anymore anyway..
Then again.. there is Viagra... So who knows... Still funny none the less.. 
If I go in for a routine procedure and come out missing my tallywhacker, you can be damned sure that I would be raising holy hell over it. I mean can
you even fathom going through life without yours?
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
|
reply posted on 26-9-2008 @ 11:03 AM by silverflame
|
Oh My God after is stopped laughing this is what I think.If i was a guy i dont care what age I would sue too.
On of my friends was married to a very sexual woman. Lets just say she is hard to please. He got put on shots to keep it up. Well for her birthday he
ups the dosage and can not get it to go down. He has to have surgery before he goes in the doctor tells them it might not work again. SOOOO his wife
askes if they could make him a woman.The doctor said he would not do that without his consent. After we at work heard that we could not believe she
would say that. Needless to say it does still work and for some reason he is still married to her.
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
|
reply posted on 3-10-2008 @ 12:11 PM by Anonymous ATS
|
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
|
reply posted on 10-10-2008 @ 09:43 PM by Russian soldier
|
That sucks for that man. I would not let mine get amputated for the world.
A question, if you lose the one you have, is it possible to get a new one? I have heard of people, for example getting hands from dead people after
they lost their own.
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
|
reply posted on 11-10-2008 @ 10:41 AM by fox_3000au
|
reply to post by Russian soldier
....and if you did get someone elses attached.....
....would that make you gay for playing with it?
Food for thought so too speak...
Fox. 
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
|
reply posted on 11-10-2008 @ 05:43 PM by Russian soldier
|
Originally posted by fox_3000au
reply to post by Russian soldier
....and if you did get someone elses attached.....
....would that make you gay for playing with it?
Food for thought so too speak...
Fox.
Hahahahahaha, well its not like I'm planning to get a new one, was just wondering if its possible, so that others who lost theirs can still live
happy.
But I think it wouldn't be gay because it would be your body part once it got attached and all, but yeah, that would be pretty weird, come to think
of it.
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
|
reply posted on 11-10-2008 @ 07:40 PM by AccessDenied
|
reply to post by Rook1545
tallywhacker 
Sorry..I had to..
I just have to point out that I haven't heard that phrase in years!
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
|
reply posted on 11-10-2008 @ 08:12 PM by Thurisaz
|
Originally posted by ThichHeaded
Hes 61 get over it.. Its not like he can use it now anymore anyway..
Then again.. there is Viagra... So who knows... Still funny none the less..
um well it is also a pee pee isn't it?
how will he urinate?
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
|
reply posted on 11-10-2008 @ 08:20 PM by whatukno
|
Well that just goes to show you don't have Lorena Bobbit as your doctor. 
People should really research their care providers. It just makes sense.
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
|
