AboveTopSecret.com Video and Media Portal.Books, posters, and more.T-shirts, mouse pads, cups, and bags.Member podcasts.Conspiracy theory wiki.Alternative news headlinesBelowTopSecret.com - off topic and general chit chat.AboveTopSecret.com - conspiracy theories and


 

 

This topic is in the Religion, Faith, And Theology discussion forum.  (rss)


Non Christians What If The Bible Is True?


<<  34    35    36    37    38    39    40  >>



reply posted on 17-3-2008 @ 10:53 AM by sharati


Originally posted by Rasobasi420
My favorite argument for being a Christian, and believing in the Bible has been said over and over in many a thread, and I just can't stop laughing at.

If you accept Jesus, you'll be saved. If you don't, you'll burn. And, you might as well accept him, just to be on the safe side. After all, what have you got to lose if you're wrong?

The shear stupidity of such statements baffles me.






This is Brilliant and all that, but, Just doing for the possibility of NOT GOING TO HELL is shear stupidity... OOO, Im going to hell. I believe in nothing but what I can see and hear... with the exception of Air, oh and atoms, molecules... etc. Also touch, that is another thing I believe in....



   copyright & usage 


reply posted on 17-3-2008 @ 10:57 AM by Rasobasi420


reply to post by sharati



I was thinking more along the lines of Christianity being wrong, but something similar being right. Like if David Koresh was acutally the messiah, and all these people are going to hell for believing in Jesus instead of him.

Total baloney, of course, but it's the exact same thing as Christianity.

For that matter, what's stopping me from saying that I'm the messiah, and that if you don't believe in me, you'll burn in hell. And, after all, you might as well, just to be on the safe side.



   copyright & usage 


reply posted on 17-3-2008 @ 11:02 AM by Bigwhammy


reply to post by sharati



I never asked you to spend the next year of your life, I simply said, show me Actual proof. I never said show me proof that all of the contradictions have been debunked.



Didn't you just post this?


Show me proof, show me actual evidence that EVERY known theory in the bible is 100% debunked. I may then, give you some time to see things through others eyes.


I'm afraid it would take about a year to go through EVERY known theory, maybe longer.


As for the red sea. That is said in the very first actual video I posted. The whole thing, not just the first part. There is a Doctor, well, rather a Ph.D who calls himself Dr. Paul Meijer, He considers himself a man of faith, and he goes throughout the entire video trying to prove the same theories that I believe are completely contradictary. I am using perverbially showing the double bladed sword, showing both sides of a story, and still it makes no sence.


The archaeological data confirms the Biblical account. The chariot wheels found under the Red Sea were only used during a particular time period which is the exact dynasty corresponding with the Exodus account. The place of the crossing was marked by pillars that were likely erected by King Solomon.

You're always going to have Phd critics trying to discredit the Bible. It has been going on for thousands of years, so far none have succeeded. There are 2 Billion Christians. Atheists are a minority. Common equals the majority. So they do not in fact even have common sense. I believe most people don't like the idea of being accountable to God. That's the real issue behind all the fuss. Very simply they can do away with the rules by not believing in God. See the OP is a parenthetical "What If". If the Bible is true it might affect your sex life hmmmmm?



   copyright & usage 


reply posted on 17-3-2008 @ 11:42 AM by sharati


Originally posted by Rasobasi420
reply to post by sharati




For that matter, what's stopping me from saying that I'm the messiah, and that if you don't believe in me, you'll burn in hell. And, after all, you might as well, just to be on the safe side.


Well, I can't believe you are the Messiah, because then I would have to renounce my title as such. Sorry, I had first dibs...



   copyright & usage 
AboveTopSecret.com is advertising supported.


reply posted on 17-3-2008 @ 11:45 AM by Rasobasi420


Originally posted by Bigwhammy
There are 2 Billion Christians. Atheists are a minority. Common equals the majority. So they do not in fact even have common sense.







Oh man, the logic is blinding!!! I'm just glad that we all have accepted that what the majority believes is true, must be true. That worked so well for Galileo didn't it?



   copyright & usage 


reply posted on 17-3-2008 @ 12:13 PM by The Nighthawk


Originally posted by Bigwhammy
The archaeological data confirms the Biblical account. The chariot wheels found under the Red Sea were only used during a particular time period which is the exact dynasty corresponding with the Exodus account. The place of the crossing was marked by pillars that were likely erected by King Solomon.


Debunked.

Zahi Hawass Says "No Evidence" of Red Sea Parting

If the Bible is true it might affect your sex life hmmmmm?


Not if you really believe your earlier comments about salvation being free for the asking. I could be the most disgusting, perverted heathen imaginable, enough to put Caligula to shame, and near the end just ask Big J for forgiveness and I'll be saved. That's the deal, right? You said it was, at least before. Or was that AshleyD? Does it really matter?



   copyright & usage 


reply posted on 17-3-2008 @ 12:25 PM by Bigwhammy


reply to post by The Nighthawk



Debunked.



I don't know what you are talking about. Do you? That article doesn't' even mention Ron Wyatt's find. Sorry he didn't debunk the evidence I presented. He didn't even address it.


One of Many Egyptian Chariot Wheels found under Red Sea Crossing point


Not if you really believe your earlier comments about salvation being free for the asking. I could be the most disgusting, perverted heathen imaginable, enough to put Caligula to shame, and near the end just ask Big J for forgiveness and I'll be saved. That's the deal, right? You said it was, at least before. Or was that AshleyD? Does it really matter?


That's a pretty lame argument. Salvation is free... but you have to be genuine in the asking. If you're using it as a get out of jail free card to continue sinning it isn't really genuine now is it.


[edit on 3/17/2008 by Bigwhammy]



   copyright & usage 


reply posted on 17-3-2008 @ 12:34 PM by The Nighthawk


Originally posted by Bigwhammy

I don't know what you are talking about. Do you? That article doesn't' even mention Ron Wyatt's find. Sorry he didn't debunk the evidence I presented. He didn't even address it.


Ron Wyatt is also thoroughly debunked as a hoaxer and scam artist.

Ron Wyatt Exposed

That's a pretty lame argument. Salvation is free... but you have to be genuine in the asking. If you're using it as a get out of jail free card to continue sinning it isn't really genuine now is it.


Ah, so there ARE conditions besides just asking. Glad you could do me the favor of contradicting yourself. It has to be genuine. This is in direct contradiction to earlier statements that salvation is totally free for the asking, a gift to be given freely. As I stated before, a "gift" that has to be in any way "earned" is no gift at all.

[edit on 3/17/2008 by The Nighthawk]



   copyright & usage 


reply posted on 17-3-2008 @ 12:46 PM by Bigwhammy


reply to post by The Nighthawk


I agree he was wrong with his Ark claim was an error and maybe even a scam, but that doesn't address the Red Sea chariot wheels which is what we were discussing. That picture above is one of the wheels. Others have been found, there's a thread hear where JD posted them.

red sea evidence



   copyright & usage 


reply posted on 17-3-2008 @ 12:52 PM by Bigwhammy


Chariot Wheels Found in Red Sea Print E-mail
Tuesday, 04 March 2008

Parting of the Red Sea

Chariot Wheels found at the bottom of the Red Sea



You will be surprised to see proof of Pharaoh's chariot and bones of horses and men found in the Red Sea. Evidence of the crossing of the Red Sea . . . Pharaoh's drowned army.
Confirmation of the actual Exodus route has come from divers finding coral-encrusted bones and chariot remains in the Gulf of Aqaba . ONE of the most dramatic records of Divine intervention in history is the account of the Hebrews' exodus from Egypt

Repeated dives in depths ranging from 60 to 200 feet deep (18m to 60m), over a stretch of almost 2.5 km, has shown that the chariot parts are scattered across the sea bed. Artifacts found include wheels, chariot bodies, as well as human and horse bones. Divers have located on the Saudi coastline opposite Nuweiba as well.


source



   copyright & usage 
AboveTopSecret.com is advertising supported.


reply posted on 17-3-2008 @ 01:12 PM by The Nighthawk


Originally posted by Bigwhammy
reply to post by The Nighthawk


I agree he was wrong with his Ark claim was an error and maybe even a scam, but that doesn't address the Red Sea chariot wheels which is what we were discussing. That picture above is one of the wheels. Others have been found, there's a thread hear where JD posted them.

red sea evidence



Actually the source I linked DOES state his "red sea chariot wheels" are also a fraud. Look fuirther than the Ark stuff. Wyatt is a huckster, pure and simple.

(edit) I'm sorry, a DEAD huckster. And your other "sources" all directly point back to Wyatt. Aaron Sen is mentioned in one; he is known to be one of Wyatt's sidekicks. ALL of your "evidence" for the "Red Sea Massacre" is based on a couple of wheels and bones supposedly found by a known charlatan and his cohorts. Tell you what, you get in touch with WAR and see if they'll release said "evidence" to the Field Museum in Chicago for analysis.

[edit on 3/17/2008 by The Nighthawk]



   copyright & usage 


reply posted on 17-3-2008 @ 01:29 PM by Bigwhammy


reply to post by The Nighthawk




Well if you are right, then all you've done is disprove Ron Wyatt. I did read your link and I know he made a bad claim about the Ark, there are several Ark finds in contention by the way... It still did nothing to disprove the chariot wheels. Maybe I was misled. I admit I am not sure about Ron Wyatt now.



   copyright & usage 


reply posted on 17-3-2008 @ 01:40 PM by The Nighthawk


Originally posted by Bigwhammy
Well if you are right, then all you've done is disprove Ron Wyatt. I did read your link and I know he made a bad claim about the Ark, there are several Ark finds in contention by the way... It still did nothing to disprove the chariot wheels. Maybe I was misled. I admit I am not sure about Ron Wyatt now.



It's right there, in the same article I linked to:


"To date, none of those who invested this money has seen a shred of scientific evidence substantiating Ron Wyatt's claims. Where is the report from the blood sample analysis of what Ron claims is the blood of Jesus Christ? Where is the Ark of the Covenant? Which museum is housing the ancient chariot wheels he claimed to have been from the Red Sea Crossing? There is no evidence because the video is a fraud. On the Noah's Ark video, all the so-called scientific data cannot be duplicated, a clear sign that what was given the labs was false data. (Read John Baumgarten's and Tom Fenner's letter)"


I think that pretty much seals it. Wyatt, and all his associates=Liars.



   copyright & usage 


reply posted on 17-3-2008 @ 01:46 PM by Bigwhammy


reply to post by The Nighthawk



You know I believe I was misled by those articles and videos on Ron Wyatt. It does look like he is a hoax now. I trust the Answers In Genesis site and they do not believe him.

Some unsolicited evidence also came our way concerning the alleged chariot wheels of the Exodus (which have never been made available to any archaeologists, Bible-believing or otherwise). There is a Jonathan Gray video purporting to show these on the bottom of the Red Sea. In one part, Gray claims that a ‘British Admiralty chart’ he is holding shows a ‘sand bridge’ with great depths either side.

source



   copyright & usage 


reply posted on 17-3-2008 @ 02:08 PM by The Nighthawk


Originally posted by BigwhammyYou know I believe I was misled by those articles and videos on Ron Wyatt. It does look like he is a hoax now. I trust the Answers In Genesis site and they do not believe him.


Answers in Genesis isn't exactly above-board either.

Answers in Genesis Site Busted

And frankly, if the Red Sea narrative were true, shouldn't there be thousands of chariots and bodies in there? Shouldn't there be a whole mess of stuff practically littering the Red Sea? Shouldn't Noah's Ark, if it was ever real, have been found by now with all the people supposedly looking for it? Why is it that claims of extraordinary evidence of Biblical events is so rarely offered to the public museums and universities of the world for analysis?



   copyright & usage 


reply posted on 17-3-2008 @ 02:14 PM by Bigwhammy


reply to post by The Nighthawk



Well the OP is such evidence. The Elba tablets.
www.belowtopsecret.com...

It quited the critics who claimed for years that Sodom and Gremoorah never existed.

They also used to say that in Moses time there was no writing, and theses tablets verified there was...



   copyright & usage 
AboveTopSecret.com is advertising supported.


reply posted on 17-3-2008 @ 04:05 PM by The Nighthawk


Originally posted by Bigwhammy

Well the OP is such evidence. The Elba tablets.

It quited the critics who claimed for years that Sodom and Gremoorah never existed.


Actually, Paolo Matthiae, discoverer of the Ebla site and director of the expedition since 1963, holds a different view.

"The tablets cover a thousand years before Abraham, and a thousand years, even in the fourth millennium before Christ, was a very, very long time. They tell us much, but what they don't tell us—what they can't tell us—is whether the Bible is true or not. They have nothing to do with the Bible, at least not directly, and what we have here is not a biblical expedition. If we have tablets with legends similar to those of the Bible it means only that such legends existed round here long before the Bible." ( C. Bermant and M. Weitzman, Ebla: A Revelation In Archaeology, Op. Cit., p. 2.)"


Being the director of the expedition I'd say it's a pretty safe bet he's something of an expert.

They also used to say that in Moses time there was no writing, and theses tablets verified there was...


This is simply preposterous. What scholars ever said that? Obviously there was writing; this was 1400-1200BC and the Egyptians obviously were writing during this period. The Sumerians as well have writings pre-dating this period.



   copyright & usage 


reply posted on 17-3-2008 @ 04:31 PM by Bigwhammy


reply to post by The Nighthawk



They did prove the existence of the cities I listed. The fact they are extra Biblical in nature only further verifies that they were real places. That was one of the old criticisms of the Bible that is no longer used because the Elba tablets mentioned them. One of the old criticisms people used to say was that people didn't have writing back then. I know it's ridiculous that's the point.Nothing other than the return of Christ is going to prove the bible absolutely. You might get to witness it soon too.


[edit on 3/17/2008 by Bigwhammy]



   copyright & usage 


reply posted on 17-3-2008 @ 04:41 PM by an3rkist


Originally posted by Bigwhammy
There are 2 Billion Christians. Atheists are a minority. Common equals the majority. So they do not in fact even have common sense.


2 billion Christians, eh? And how many people are in this world? Over 6 BILLION? So Christians are a minority too, and by your logic do not have common sense. I understand that your reply was to somebody coming from my side of the argument who has been somewhat hostile, but he's been no more hostile than your above comment. I've tried very hard to remain un-hostile in this conversation, despite my very firm beliefs that Christianity is the most flawed major dogma to ever grace the human race, and I would hope you would do the same. Perhaps you didn't mean it, but you just said we atheists have no common sense. And, as I pointed out, you based it on a logic that says that you, also, have no common sense. Atheists are a minority and thus have no common sense? I'll bite my tongue on this one to avoid getting permanently banned from ATS.

I believe most people don't like the idea of being accountable to God. That's the real issue behind all the fuss. Very simply they can do away with the rules by not believing in God. See the OP is a parenthetical "What If". If the Bible is true it might affect your sex life hmmmmm?


I think you've got this backwards. I believe that Christians LOVE the idea of being accountable to God, because if they weren't they would have to actually think for themselves...God forbid! I mentioned in an earlier reply that becoming atheist was probably the hardest thing Ive ever done in my life, because suddenly I had to decide for myself what was right and what was wrong, (among other reasons). Having a structured belief system is a convenient way to ignore the real issues and not figure them out for yourselves. It lends a little bit of credence to the old adage, "Ignorance is bliss."

(Edit for grammar. My fingers fly when I'm fuming...)

[edit on 17/3/08 by an3rkist]



   copyright & usage 


reply posted on 17-3-2008 @ 04:51 PM by Bigwhammy


I think the common sense thing applies to belief in God. Most people do believe in some sort of God. So it is common sense to believe in God.

I'm sorry you feel that way but there really isn't going to be justice in this world. I believe you will answer to God one day.



   copyright & usage 


<<  34    35    36    37    38    39    40  >>






























































ATS Server: www3.theabovenetwork.com
Powered by AboveTop:Board v2.3
Header data processed in 0.003 seconds
Page processed in 0.284 seconds
6 total database queries (1)

(:)








The Below Top Secret General Discussion Web site is a wholly owned social content community of The Above Network, LLC.

This content community relies on user-generated content from our member contributors.
The opinions of our members are not those of site ownershipwho maintains
strict editorial agnosticism and simply provides a collaborative venue for free expression.






It looks like you're using some kind of software designed to block advertising while surfing our site.

We work very hard to provide an efficient Internet presence that services over 200,000 daily visits from people and automated web spiders. A large web site like this, that can handle that amount of traffic, is increasingly expensive to operate. Our only viable source of revenue (for now) are the ads displayed on each page.

If you enjoy our content, please enable our domain in your ad-blocking package.

more information       contact us

[hide this message]