 |
|
Topic started on 7-12-2007 @ 05:43 AM by budski
|
In recent years, I've stopped following boxing as much as I once did, but this is a fight which has re-kindled my interest - the consummate boxer
against the best pressure fighter around.
Both fighters are unbeaten with Mayweather perhaps having the edge in quality of opponent (although Kosta Tszyu may argue with that) and with Hatton
having fought more times.
Personally, I think if it goes the distance, then Mayweather will win.
Hatton needs to stop him and it's difficult to see how he can do this, given Mayweathers boxing skills and ringcraft.
Let's not forget though that Hatton is also a very good boxer and had a glittering amateur career - a fighter doesn't win medals at world and ABA
levels unless he can box.
I'd love for Hatton to win, he's from my home town (I was born just a couple of miles up the road) and he's a real down to earth, working class
hero kind of bloke.
Unfortunately, I can't see it.
Yes he beat Tszyu, who was at that time regarded as one of the best pound for pound fighters, but Mayweather brings a different set of skills, not to
mention his speed and movement.
If Hatton can get close he can hurt Mayweather, and hurt him badly - and this I feel is his only real chance.
For me, Mayweather on points.
Or Hatton to stop him by the ninth.
 can't make my mind up!
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 7-12-2007 @ 06:15 AM by DeadFlagBlues
|
reply to post by budski
I gave up on MMA and took up boxing. I just connect with it better. I can go trash some guy any day of the week, but there's an amazing amount of
specific skill in boxing.
Hatton can take a beating and mayweather hasn't been known for his power. I can't wait to see how this ends up. I like both of them, though I'm
with Hatton on this one!
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 7-12-2007 @ 06:25 AM by budski
|
reply to post by DeadFlagBlues
I boxed when I was younger (amateur), and it's a great sport - I just kind of grew out of it, but this one has me enthralled.
Should be a cracker, especially if Hatton can get inside and rough him up.
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 7-12-2007 @ 06:51 AM by DeadFlagBlues
|
reply to post by budski
He can take a few, that's for sure. That guy definitely knows the meaning of "take one to give one."
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 7-12-2007 @ 11:02 AM by aylyan
|
hatton by ko inside 5 for me
mayweather ducked tszyu like so many others,not hatton
hatton in his prime took an aging tszyu out,still no mean feat
not to get off topic,just an aside for the fans who may not have seen early tszyu,check this footage.it's tszyu winning the 91 amateur title.the guy
he's fighting is no mug if you know the game
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 7-12-2007 @ 11:25 AM by budski
|
I've been watching some of Hattons fights, and I'd forgotten how devastating a body puncher he is.
Those hooks up into the short ribs are killer punches.
If he can get inside, I fancy him to take it.
I'd also forgotten just how mobile he is, with great lateral movement and punches coming from different angles.
I think Mayweather just may have his work cut out to win this one, Hatton just never stops coming, and he has the power to hurt.
Fingers crossed.
Amir Khan also fighting tomorrow night vs Graham Earl, commonwealth title bout - he should take it no problem as long as he doesn't hang his chin out
again.
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 7-12-2007 @ 11:32 AM by Dr Love
|
No way Hatton comes even close in this fight. This is the fight of Hatton's life so far so he'll be swinging without a doubt. Mayweather knows he
can't sleepwalk through this guy and is going to be at his best. Too much speed and power for Hatton.
Mayweather wins by KO in 7 rounds or less.
I want to see Mayweather and Pacquiao go at it, but Pacquiao has to move up in weight I believe.
Peace
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 7-12-2007 @ 11:54 AM by budski
|
reply to post by Dr Love
Dunno about the power - Hatton prettymuch walked through Tszyu, and he was a really heavy puncher.
If Mayweather wins, it'll be on points.
Pity we can't bet some points on the outcome!
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 7-12-2007 @ 12:18 PM by Dr Love
|
Originally posted by budski
Pity we can't bet some points on the outcome! 
I'm game if the bosses will let us.
Peace
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 7-12-2007 @ 12:49 PM by DeadFlagBlues
|
reply to post by Dr Love
No way Mayweather has the strength to knock Hatton out. In fact, I'd say the power lies with Hatton, and the speed is all Mayweathers. Also, Hatton
can take more of a beating than mayweather.
Hatton is at 43-0 with 31 KO's
Mayweather 38-0 with 24 KO's
I'm excited for this fight.
I'm still ins on Hatton, but I have a feeling with Mayweather's speed he's going to rack up some points.
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 7-12-2007 @ 12:57 PM by budski
|
I've just noticed something.
Mayweather has a tendency to stick his chin out when he's under pressure and trying to get out of it by throwing those long punches in fast
combinations.
He can also be hurt, and he ain't gonna like those body punches.
The Hitman could give the bodysnatcher lessons in short ribs punches.
OOOOO I'm getting excited
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 7-12-2007 @ 03:23 PM by Dr Love
|
"No go" on the bet Budski (and I don't blame them), but how 'bout this, whoever loses has to add to their signature "I'm (Dr Love's or
Budski's) red-headed stepchild" for a whole month?
Peace
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 7-12-2007 @ 03:42 PM by budski
|
Yeah, I didn't think it would happen.
A counter suggestion to spice things up and make the bet worthwhile.
Signature contains "I'm (Insert name)'s Bitch"
Got the nuts for it?
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 7-12-2007 @ 03:57 PM by Dr Love
|
Originally posted by budski
Signature contains "I'm (Insert name)'s Bitch"

"A female dog" may be against T&C. If you clear it with management, sure I'll do it. If they say "no" we go with my suggestion.......deal?
I'm about to leave and I'm not sure if I'll be online tomorrow, so I'll just assume you accept. I got Mayweather, you got Hatton.
Peace
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 7-12-2007 @ 03:59 PM by budski
|
cool, leave the forfeit for later - I accept the bet.
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 7-12-2007 @ 04:13 PM by Crakeur
|
no on the female dog line.
Perhaps we can come up with something that won't, potentially, raise the ire of some of our members.
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 7-12-2007 @ 04:14 PM by budski
|
Originally posted by Dr Love
how 'bout this, whoever loses has to add to their signature "I'm (Dr Love's or Budski's) red-headed stepchild" for a whole month?
Peace 
This ok?
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 7-12-2007 @ 04:16 PM by Crakeur
|
that's fine.
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 7-12-2007 @ 04:20 PM by budski
|
Then the terms of the bet are defined. cool.
Still laughing at your last u2u.
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 7-12-2007 @ 04:22 PM by Crakeur
|
sad but true
that u2u
sincerely,
Dr. Seuss
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |