Well, it's about time. We've seen it with chess, checkers and backgammon, and now it's poker's turn. It's interesting to note that this poker
computer adapts to a person's style of play, and is constantly changing it's stratagy against the real player. I guess it has a pattern recognition
system of some sort, almost like a primative form of artificial intelligence.
It's a two day contest ending some time today, I will try to post the results of the contest later tonight.
Great post I'd love to see how this one turns out, although they shouldn't consider laak the guru of poker to challenge a computer.... To be more
accurate in it's decision it'd have to play more professionals then him
Originally posted by elevatedone
shouldn't the computer be playing against Phil Helmeuth, after all he has declared himself as the greatest Texas Hold'em Player ever.
Yeah, and according to him if luck weren't involved he would win every one! I personally would have chosen Doyle Brunson and Phil Ivey for the
job.
I think the most recent updates are posted here, SE7EN.....
The humans have won! They won 2 of the 4 matches, tied once and lost once. I'm not too suprised, it'll be awhile before computers can beat
humans at poker, there is to much of a changing dynamic in the game, not something computers can grasp just yet.
ATS Server: www3.theabovenetwork.com
Powered by AboveTop:Board v2.3
Header data processed in 0.002 seconds
Page processed in 0.132 seconds
6 total database queries (1)
The Below Top Secret General Discussion Web site is a wholly owned social content community of The Above Network, LLC.
I personally would have chosen Doyle Brunson and Phil Ivey for the
job. 
They won 2 of the 4 matches, tied once and lost once. I'm not too suprised, it'll be awhile before computers can beat
humans at poker, there is to much of a changing dynamic in the game, not something computers can grasp just yet. 
