Umbrax, you locked a topic that I was replying in earlier - I hope that you won't mind if I put those comments in here now, considering the time I
took to write them:
Sounds like we saw two different films.
Originally posted by riley
I didn't want to put spoilers in the other thread.. but I have to get this out.
On reflection:
Cyclops.. they turned him into a flake [for obvious reasons].. "He's a different man now." I'm guessing it was a contract thing [allowing for more
Halle time].
Scott's been a spoiled little whiner since the very first film. Marsden wasn't happy (referenced on tons of interviews) with his character or
playing in the film, so Rattner obviously cut him (and everyone else) a break. Cyclops was far from the most focal or popular character.
The part where the bad guys are ordered to guared the house and not let Wolverine and Storm in.. yet the bad guy picks him up and throws him
through the front window.

That made alot of sense..
That was definately a Juggernaut action. Marko isn't the sharpest knife in the drawer, nor was he ever portrayed as such in the film. It made perfect
sense...
Where X defends his behaviour to Wolverine and sounds like a bumbling idiot.. again.. probably to make him morally expendable.
Where X has a go at wolverine for waking up Phoenix.. even though she woke herself up.
The entire point of that, plus several other key scenes with
Professor X was so that we could learn that he is not the perfect saint, but a man
who takes questionable steps if needed, to meet his beliefs. That helped to blur the line between he and Magneto. This was the basis of the "Take a
stand" campaign...
He didn't "have a go" at Logan... he wasn't there to see that Wolverine was not responsible for Jean going bonkers and acted on instinct.
The really bad al-cheapo cost cutting rubber bits stuck to Mistiques face, and the scence which had her morphing for absolutely no
reason. Magnetos uncharactoristic [in the context of the other films] betrayal, he would have at least covered her up.
I didn't have any problems with the special effects or make uo, and I really don't think that your critique of her facial appearance has merit. The
scenes where she was morphing were done to show 1. The range of her abilities and 2. To play head games with the security personnel.
The ice-man stand off at the end.. very original.. not reminisent of Star Wars at all.

I agree. It was original and was in no way reminiscent of anything in Star Wars other than the "good vs evil"
Halle Berry's failed acting attempt to create 'tension' and chemistry between storm and Wolverine [contract thing- they should not have
caved to her demands].
I'm not sure where or how you have gained access to these contracts that you keep quoting, but I would like to know.
The pre-battle near group hug moment.

[at least they didn't hi-5]
The flying guy who had no real impact on the plot yet had an opening scene dedicated to creating his charactor.
His name is Warren Kenneth Worthington III, codename: Angel. He's not "the flying guy". I'm thinking that his impact on the plot was that his
father was the developer of the "cure" that was the focal point for the entire feature.
The bad editing.. there seemed to be not only scenes missing but scenes cut in half. Other scenes seemed rushed while others seemed detailed.
There wasn't enough continuity to allow the viewer to get drawn in. [edit on 27-5-2006 by riley]
Ya lost me again there - without any references or examples I can't comment.
I was in no way disappointed. You, for example, complain that there was less character development than in 1 and 2. That´s right, but you should not
see X3 as a single film. You should see it as part of a trilogy.
Character development was done in 1 and 2 (to a certain extent), so part 3 could be “assigned” to be the big finale of the battle, which it indeed
was. Sure, there are new faces, which
would give an interesting story, but where would this have lead to? Tell the indepth story of Colossus,
of Shadowcat, of the Morlocks, of Multiple Man, the family bonds between Juggernaut and Prof. X, the circumstances how Xavier lost the use of his
legs, etc… there wouldn´t be any time left to bring up a story.
If I may, there have been plenty of movies out there that I saw and that I thought sucked (though in reviewing them I do try to employ slightly more
well-read adjectives). It's really best to have a level of familiarity with the subject matter. Grammar, spelling, referencing facts, and proper use
of character names go a long way of helping write a more readable review.
I say this not because I loved this film and you didn't - but as a writer. When I've had comics reviewed by folks who didn't have a firm grasp of
what they were reviewing, I felt cheated