This topic is in the People discussion forum.  (rss)


Well, they killed her....


<<  7    8    9    10  >>



reply posted on 7-9-2005 @ 03:51 PM by skippytjc


Natelie who?


Looks like Fox has dumped their pet project. They dumped Natelie for Katrina...



reply to this post:   copyright & usage 


reply posted on 9-9-2005 @ 07:22 AM by skippytjc


BIG NEWS that got lost in the Katrina wake:


Vandersloot flee's to Holland!!! Tell me that boy isnt as guilty as he can be....

Why would an innocent person flee? Don’t matter much anyways; if they want him he will be extradited.

Its like a peanut gallery down there...



reply to this post:   copyright & usage 


reply posted on 9-9-2005 @ 07:39 AM by Tinkleflower


What kind of extradition agreements do the Dutch have with the US?

I know there's one specifically in place for the transport of terrorists, but I'm not sure how it stands otherwise; most European countries are reluctant to extradite if the death penalty is a possibility (as most no longer have it themselves). Besides that though, many countries simply will not extradite one of their own citizens, regardless of the crime.

(does this even matter? If the crime was committed in Aruba, there's no US jurisdiction anyway, correct? And if that's the case, why would the Netherlands extradite someone from one part of their Kingdom, to another?)



reply to this post:   copyright & usage 


reply posted on 9-9-2005 @ 07:55 AM by TheBandit795


This is ridiculous. He didn't flee to Holland. He went to Holland to study. College there starts this week. If anything he still has to maintain regular contact with the authorities there, and he can be detained again if necessary. He's not out of the hands of the authorities.



reply to this post:   copyright & usage 


reply posted on 9-9-2005 @ 07:58 AM by Tinkleflower



Originally posted by TheBandit795
This is ridiculous. He didn't flee to Holland. He went to Holland to study. College there starts this week.


Isn't it tragic how something so benign can be twisted into something so malignant? What on earth happened to the premise of being innocent before proven guilty? Or have we just decided he's guilty, without a trial, because the Media seems to think he is, too?



(Could you confirm the legalities of extradition for me, perchance?)



reply to this post:   copyright & usage 


reply posted on 9-9-2005 @ 08:38 AM by skippytjc


For somebody who is just "going to study" he sure was happy to be there...


I would think that being the center piece of a murder investigation would keep him close to home...But I guess things work differently down there in regards to this sort of thing.



reply to this post:   copyright & usage 


reply posted on 9-9-2005 @ 10:19 AM by Tinkleflower



Originally posted by skippytjc
For somebody who is just "going to study" he sure was happy to be there...

I would think that being the center piece of a murder investigation would keep him close to home...But I guess things work differently down there in regards to this sort of thing.


It's the same Kingdom, dude...it's not like he's gone to study in Australia.

More to the point though; how long has "being happy" been a crime?

Even if he is guilty, this doesn't negate the basic premise of innocent until proven guilty; it's unfair for you, me or anyone else to decide his culpability and worse, decide we know the motivation behind his actions.

(Weren't you happy to be at college, too?)



reply to this post:   copyright & usage 


reply posted on 9-9-2005 @ 01:56 PM by TheBandit795



Originally posted by Tinkleflower work differently down there in regards to this sort of thing.


It's the same Kingdom, dude...


The same kingdom which he's not allowed to leave. He's not allowed to go to any country outside of the Dutch kingdom.


reply to this post:   copyright & usage 


reply posted on 9-9-2005 @ 02:24 PM by Tinkleflower



Originally posted by TheBandit795
The same kingdom which he's not allowed to leave. He's not allowed to go to any country outside of the Dutch kingdom.


(Psst...t'was skippy who said the bit about "things work differently down there")

But yeah, that was my point

I guess I'm just disturbed by the whole presumption of guilt thing, you know?



reply to this post:   copyright & usage 


reply posted on 9-9-2005 @ 02:47 PM by Dr Love



Originally posted by Tinkleflower
I guess I'm just disturbed by the whole presumption of guilt thing, you know?


Yeah I know what you mean. I presumed O.J. was guilty. You can imagine how foolish I felt in the end.

Peace



reply to this post:   copyright & usage 


reply posted on 9-9-2005 @ 09:05 PM by TheBandit795


It doesn't mean you're right. You could be wrong, you know. Maybe you didn't think that that's a possibility.

And I'm not talking about OJ.

[edit on 9-9-2005 by TheBandit795]



reply to this post:   copyright & usage 


reply posted on 22-2-2006 @ 01:05 PM by skippytjc


Exclusive: Videotape Shows Natalee Holloway and Joran Van Der Sloot Together at Aruba Casino


ABC

Been around, but the first we have heard of it.



reply to this post:   copyright & usage 


<<  7    8    9    10  >>







Top Topics Right Now:



Active Topics Right Now:



ATS MIX Podcasts:











Newest Topics:
































ATS Server: www4.theabovenetwork.com
Powered by AboveTop:Board v2.3
Header data processed in 1.040 seconds
Page processed in 0.202 seconds
6 total database queries (1)









The Below Top Secret General Discussion Web site is a wholly owned social content community of The Above Network, LLC.





thread
Forums Directory