 |
reply posted on 29-1-2005 @ 02:33 AM by Amuk
|
Damn Skippy.....LOL
[edit on 29-1-2005 by Amuk]
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 29-1-2005 @ 03:35 AM by Umbrax
|
 Originally posted by spliff4020
Well, my point is this. Being gay is a lifestyle choice.

Funny, I don't remember choosing to be strait.
With all the gay material in Kevin Smith movies I thought you would have different views on this subject.
Anyway this topic is about gay cartoon characters.
Why is sponge bob gay?
I've seen the cartoon few times. It may be ridiculously stupid but the sea creatures aren't in manly love.
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 29-1-2005 @ 11:08 AM by spliff4020
|
Originally posted by Umbrax
 Originally posted by spliff4020
Well, my point is this. Being gay is a lifestyle choice.

Funny, I don't remember choosing to be strait.
With all the gay material in Kevin Smith movies I thought you would have different views on this subject.
Anyway this topic is about gay cartoon characters.
Being straight isnt a choice. Its how we humans ARE programmed, secondly, I have no personal problems with gays. The problem lies in the media,
constantly shoving it down, not only mine, but now, my kids throats as well.
This nut job who thinks sponge bob is gay is just another wacked out christian who looks to deep into things.
Why is sponge bob gay?
I've seen the cartoon few times. It may be ridiculously stupid but the sea creatures aren't in manly love.

|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 30-1-2005 @ 01:38 AM by iori_komei
|
Spliff, your lucky I dont know who you are in real life for I know a great amount about the law.
Technicly you're right your not being racist, your discriminating a gainst a group of people whom are not like yourself.
The best word I can come with is Preferencist
(Discriminating against someones sexual preference).
Why has he not been banned, or at the least given a warning?
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 30-1-2005 @ 02:33 AM by spliff4020
|
Originally posted by iori_komei
Spliff, your lucky I dont know who you are in real life for I know a great amount about the law.
Technicly you're right your not being racist, your discriminating a gainst a group of people whom are not like yourself.
The best word I can come with is Preferencist
(Discriminating against someones sexual preference).
Why has he not been banned, or at the least given a warning? 
Your point is what? I think you should read the whole post before you say anything. I havent broken any rules. Im not going to rehash this again. If
you have something of interest to post about this, feel free.
BTW, your word does not exist, at least, not in the webster dictionary.
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 30-1-2005 @ 02:47 AM by iori_komei
|
I really wouldnt get you in trouble if I knew who you were, I fI put my mind to it I probably could though, I'll give you this you are one of the
only two people whom have riled me up that badly with your posts.
You can believe what ever you want, its a free country (atleast mostly free).
I know the word doesnt exist but it's the only I could make that describes it.
I may not agree with what you say, but I'll fight for your right to save it.
Peace.
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 31-1-2005 @ 01:10 AM by spliff4020
|
Originally posted by iori_komei
I really wouldnt get you in trouble if I knew who you were, I fI put my mind to it I probably could though, I'll give you this you are one of the
only two people whom have riled me up that badly with your posts.
You can believe what ever you want, its a free country (atleast mostly free).
I know the word doesnt exist but it's the only I could make that describes it.
I may not agree with what you say, but I'll fight for your right to save it.
Peace. 
Look, you fight the good fight, allright. Im not a racist, nor am I a homophobe. I harbor no ill will towards someone because of their sexual
preference. My problem lies in them shoving it down my kids throat. Its a hidden agenda. Its telling the kids "Hey ! be gay! its fun!" when, in all
actuality, its quite the opposite.
Let the kids be kids. They dont need sex shoved at them. Not when they are kids. Its a form of mind control, and actually, its probably more of a
conspiricy than most things talked about on this board.
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 31-1-2005 @ 01:49 AM by iori_komei
|
I think they should put shows on for younger children on that do not have couples, that way there not being influenced, or taught that one certain
SexualOrientation is the right one, I mean when you get down to it, you cant stop a person from being gay.
What would you do if one of your child was gay?
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 31-1-2005 @ 02:04 AM by spliff4020
|
Originally posted by iori_komei
I think they should put shows on for younger children on that do not have couples, that way there not being influenced, or taught that one certain
SexualOrientation is the right one, I mean when you get down to it, you cant stop a person from being gay.
What would you do if one of your child was gay? 
What would you do if one of your child was gay?

I'd feel disappointed and let down. Just not to his face.
I think they should put shows on for younger children on that do not have couples, that way there not being influenced, or taught that one certain
SexualOrientation is the right one

I disagree. Childrens programs should have moms and dads. They dont comprehend sex. But it has no place on their tv shows. Neither does showing a kid
with 2 mommies or 2 daddies. Its not normal. And it is certainly not a majority of our society. There might be alot of gay people, but the amount of
actual domestic gay partners is a very very small percent of our society. The reason? The right sexual orientation of humans is hetero.
I mean when you get down to it, you cant stop a person from being gay

If you mean, physically restrain them, probably not. But if taught young enough, they can learn it. Thats called brainwashing, and its disgusting.
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 31-1-2005 @ 03:18 AM by Croat56
|
Wow alot of gay stuff being thrown around here. I personally dont agree with gay ppl. I think it is a choice. If its not a choice then how do you
explain bisexuals? I really dont want to see gay ppl on tv. Theres already way to much sex anyway.
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 4-2-2005 @ 01:50 PM by Gazrok
|
 Noone is "meant" to be gay. Whatever that means. Its a choice that is made. Show me the gay gene. 
Interesting...
Who would CHOOSE a life of persecution I wonder? Do animals choose to be gay? My female chihuahuas routinely try and mount each other....
Granted, I have no idea what a guy sees in another guy....but obviously this isn't a "choice"....like "hmm...I think I'd like to be sodomized
today!" Whether there's a screw loose somewhere or what, I've known enough gay men and women to realize that it isn't their "choice". Little
Jimmy can be brought up in the most hetero, strict household in the world, and if he's gay, he'll be gay, it isn't a "choice"..... I know my
brother never made such a "choice".
 Technicly you're right your not being racist, your discriminating a gainst a group of people whom are not like yourself.
The best word I can come with is Preferencist
(Discriminating against someones sexual preference).
Why has he not been banned, or at the least given a warning? 
A person is entitled to state their beliefs. HATEFUL speech is a violation. Being a racist or a bigot is not. If he had said, I think all fags
should be strung up and lit on fire, etc. THAT would be a violation. I've seen nothing so far in his posts that's a warnable offense...
[edit on 4-2-2005 by Gazrok]
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 4-2-2005 @ 06:01 PM by iori_komei
|
I meant from other thing s he's said like...never mind.
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 5-2-2005 @ 01:23 PM by spliff4020
|
Originally posted by iori_komei
I meant from other thing s he's said like...never mind. 
No please, go ahead and point out somethings. I'm interested to hear them. Remember, Just because my views are different than yours does make me
anything other than different.
Youve made these statements about me before. Im tired of it. BACK IT UP, or stop it.
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 6-2-2005 @ 12:59 AM by iori_komei
|
I thought something you said in another post broke the terms and conditions, but than I thought about it again, and it was within them.
When accept for that post have I said you should be warned or banned?
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 20-2-2005 @ 09:22 PM by Bleys
|
Disappointing to say the least - whodathunkit - Patty. I was hoping for something more outrageous. Oh well.
Springfield's website - www.springfieldisforgayloversofmarriage.com...
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 21-2-2005 @ 06:45 PM by MacMerdin
|
Spliff.....all i want to ask is:
You don't have a problem with you and your wife kissing in front of your children....ok.
You don't want your kids seeing gays kiss......fine?
How about your kids seeing you smoking pot? Just by your name on here I already know for a fact you smoke pot.
I as a gay man don't do anything illegal, but it's ok for your kids to see you doing something illegal?
Just a thought.
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 21-2-2005 @ 06:54 PM by MacMerdin
|
Originally posted by spliff4020
Its telling the kids "Hey ! be gay! its fun!" when, in all actuality, its quite the opposite.

How do you know? Really..........
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 21-2-2005 @ 07:24 PM by MacMerdin
|
Caz....how's it going man?
I'm just wondering why you started this thread and haven't said a thing so far? Please don't tell me your being an ED or a Grady.....just trolling
for points. I hope not......You're about the only person on the opposite that I actually listen to on this. Please....your opinion. You're alot
smarter than that please.
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 21-2-2005 @ 08:08 PM by iori_komei
|
Spliff, stopped replying about two weeks ago.
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 22-2-2005 @ 07:43 AM by MacMerdin
|
Oh...thanks. I guess I'm a little slow on the times.
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |